home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: comma.rhein.de!yaps!arno
- From: arno@yaps.rhein.de (Arno Eigenwillig)
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c
- Subject: Re: atexit() and return from main()
- Message-ID: <3PS-x*Ixf@yaps.rhein.de>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 1996 17:00:51 +0100
- References: <4dhfja$j50@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <4diicg$i9e@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk>
- <TANMOY.96Jan18084025@qcd.lanl.gov> <DLKrx7.6p6@ukpsshp1.serigate.philips.nl>
- Organization: Yet Another Private Site in Meckenheim, Germany
- X-Copyright: This article may not be distributed on a CD-ROM
- or in printed form without prior written consent of the author.
- X-Newsreader: Arn V 1.04
-
- In article <DLKrx7.6p6@ukpsshp1.serigate.philips.nl>, Stephen Baynes writes:
-
- > In this example what happens if no second call to exit is been made (after
- > longjumping back to main the program does not attempt to call exit again -
- > instead it keeps executing indefinately)?
-
- Does The Standard define the behaviour of infinitely long running
- programs at all? I thought it merely defined the output having been
- made after the program terminates, and the relative sequence of cer-
- tain output events (I/O, accessing volatile objects).
-
- -- __
- __/// Arno Eigenwillig /\ <arno@yaps.rhein.de> \/ PGP key available.
- \XX/ V+49-2225-5870 /\ <Arnooo @ #amigager> \/ MIME 8bit welcome.
-